Ezekiel 35-36, Revelation 9, Psalm 86 OR Sirach 40
This morning I have been playing catch-up on last week’s readings. Reading swathes of Ezekiel side by side with Revelation is enlightening. Both authors, visionaries, prophets, lived to see the destruction of Jerusalem at the hands of empirical forces: one during the rise of Babylon, the other at the hands of the Romans. Both lived within a religious minority which struggled to keep its identity and its hope alive in the face of persecution, exile, suppression and oppression. No wonder they have so much in common, from the physical details of the living creatures surrounding the heavenly throne – a cultural meme, no doubt – to the mood swings from the hell of war to the hope of heaven. The marking of the faithful, the judgement of the idolatrous, the stern faithfulness of God; name a theme in one book and find it in the other.
Earlier today, I came across an old article about secular versus religious understandings of history, and how both are infused with shared mythology. The author, John Gray, writes that,
…Grayling has no doubt as to the direction of history.
But the belief that history is a directional process is as faith-based as anything in the Christian catechism. Secular thinkers such as Grayling reject the idea of providence, but they continue to think humankind is moving towards a universal goal – a civilisation based on a science that will eventually encompass the entire species. In pre-Christian Europe, human life was understood as a series of cycles; history was seen as ratio or comic rather than redemptive. With the arrival of Christianity, it came to be believed that history had a pre-determined goal, which was human salvation.
Which is fine as far as it goes. But I wonder if Ezekiel and John of Patmos might argue that the cycle of history does not deny its direction, nor does Providence shirk the cycles of human history, tragic or comic, and universally mythological.